BPGSX vs. GLQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BPGSX (Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund) and GLQ (Clough Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BPGSX returned 18.27%/yr vs 26.70%/yr for GLQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPGSX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for GLQ.

Performance

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than GLQ's 18.38% return.

BPGSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 4.91%
• 1Y: 14.32%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLQ

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 18.38%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 41.19%
• 3Y*: 26.70%
• 5Y*: 0.59%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	2.43%	32.86%	9.62%	16.44%	-5.69%
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	18.38%	28.55%	25.41%	2.67%	-38.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and GLQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between BPGSX and GLQ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. GLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX

BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 60
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GLQ

GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BPGSX	GLQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.91	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.54	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	4.06	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	16.69	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the GLQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and GLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPGSX	GLQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.29	+0.53

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum GLQ drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and GLQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPGSX	GLQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-64.45%	+42.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	-10.61%	+5.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.20%	-19.18%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-4.30%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-17.30%	+13.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	2.58%	-1.38%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPGSX	GLQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	3.66%	-3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.53%	11.39%	-5.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.38%	14.27%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	20.32%	-5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	21.99%	-6.86%

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GLQ's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPGSX vs. GLQ - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than GLQ's 9.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	80.06%	16.14%	3.04%	1.52%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	9.45%	10.18%	10.86%	12.13%	21.42%	12.25%	9.66%	10.96%	13.68%	9.63%	11.68%	11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPGSX and GLQ in my portfolio?

BPGSX and GLQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPGSX or GLQ?

GLQ has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGSX dropped -22.19% vs GLQ's -64.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.