GLQ vs. GLV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLQ (Clough Global Equity Fund) and GLV (Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GLQ is a Global Equities fund managed by Clough Capital, while GLV is a Global Equity Income fund managed by Clough Capital. Over the past 10 years, GLQ returned 9.63%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for GLV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GLV.

Performance

GLQ vs. GLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly higher than GLV's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GLQ has outperformed GLV with an annualized return of 9.63%, while GLV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.

GLQ

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 18.38%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 41.19%
• 3Y*: 26.70%
• 5Y*: 0.59%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

GLV

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 4.86%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLQ vs. GLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	18.38%	28.55%	25.41%	2.67%	-42.31%	6.48%	28.28%	23.94%	-9.74%	32.83%
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund	11.67%	23.01%	17.85%	-8.45%	-31.93%	14.47%	7.91%	22.40%	-16.22%	22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GLQ and GLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2005	0.67

The correlation between GLQ and GLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLQ vs. GLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLQ

GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

GLV

GLV Risk / Return Rank: 61
GLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GLV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
GLV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLQ vs. GLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLQ	GLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.26	+0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.24	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.42	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	3.40	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.69	11.17	+5.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLQ vs. GLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the GLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLQ and GLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLQ	GLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.26	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	-0.01	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.28	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.23	+0.06

Drawdowns

GLQ vs. GLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GLV drawdown of -61.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and GLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLQ	GLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.45%	-61.66%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.61%	-8.21%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-13.63%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.47%	-47.37%	-10.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.47%	-47.37%	-10.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-6.06%	+1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.30%	-14.90%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.50%	+0.08%

Volatility

GLQ vs. GLV - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) at 3.45%. This indicates that GLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLQ	GLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	3.45%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.39%	10.27%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.27%	12.50%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.32%	17.32%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	19.86%	+2.13%

GLQ vs. GLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GLV's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GLQ vs. GLV - Dividend Comparison

GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, less than GLV's 10.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	9.45%	10.18%	10.86%	12.13%	21.42%	12.25%	9.66%	10.96%	13.68%	9.63%	11.68%	11.01%
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund	10.22%	10.57%	11.64%	13.92%	16.99%	10.82%	11.67%	11.17%	13.68%	10.00%	11.26%	10.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLQ and GLV in my portfolio?

GLQ and GLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLQ or GLV?

GLQ has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to GLV (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs GLV's -61.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.