BPGSX vs. BPLSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BPGSX (Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund) and BPLSX (Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - BPGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by Boston Partners, while BPLSX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Boston Partners. Over the past 3 years, BPGSX returned 17.07%/yr vs 33.35%/yr for BPLSX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPGSX charges 0.90%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for BPLSX.

Performance

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than BPLSX's 13.96% return.

BPGSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 14.15%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPLSX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 32.54%
• 3Y*: 33.35%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	2.43%	32.86%	9.62%	16.44%	-5.69%
BPLSX Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class	13.96%	28.28%	43.67%	15.23%	3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and BPLSX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between BPGSX and BPLSX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. BPLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX

BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 59
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BPLSX

BPLSX Risk / Return Rank: 95
BPLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BPLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BPLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BPLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BPLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPGSX	BPLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	3.20	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	4.89	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.58	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	6.44	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	23.24	-10.36

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the BPLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and BPLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum BPLSX drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and BPLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPGSX	BPLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-43.20%	+21.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	-5.23%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.20%	-24.58%	+12.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-1.07%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-6.30%	+2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	1.45%	-0.24%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPGSX	BPLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	4.07%	-4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.19%	8.38%	-3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.11%	10.56%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.04%	27.75%	-12.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	22.94%	-7.90%

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BPLSX's 2.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPGSX vs. BPLSX - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than BPLSX's 6.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	80.06%	16.14%	3.04%	1.52%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BPLSX Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class	6.96%	7.93%	44.35%	22.61%	12.63%	4.36%	38.62%	10.22%	8.85%	0.76%	0.00%	9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPGSX and BPLSX in my portfolio?

BPGSX and BPLSX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPGSX or BPLSX?

BPLSX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGSX dropped -22.19% vs BPLSX's -43.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BPLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.