GLQ vs. MEGI
GLQ (Clough Global Equity Fund) and MEGI (NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GLQ returned 26.55%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for MEGI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for MEGI.
Performance
GLQ vs. MEGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than MEGI's 13.94% return.
GLQ
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
MEGI
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLQ vs. MEGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund | 17.97% | 28.55% | 25.41% | 2.67% | -42.31% | -11.60% |
MEGI NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund | 13.94% | 26.19% | 5.19% | 5.52% | -23.32% | -3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLQ and MEGI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLQ vs. MEGI — Risk / Return Rank
GLQ
MEGI
GLQ vs. MEGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund (MEGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLQ | MEGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.22 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.86 | 1.81 | +2.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.22 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 1.80 | +2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.74 | 4.46 | +11.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLQ | MEGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.22 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.19 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
GLQ vs. MEGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than MEGI's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and MEGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLQ | MEGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -39.48% | -24.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.61% | -9.52% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -22.53% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -2.64% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.30% | -14.65% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.83% | -1.25% |
Volatility
GLQ vs. MEGI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) is 3.42%, while NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund (MEGI) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that GLQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLQ | MEGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.89% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 10.31% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.23% | 14.06% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 19.87% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 19.87% | +2.12% |
GLQ vs. MEGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MEGI's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLQ vs. MEGI - Dividend Comparison
GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, less than MEGI's 9.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund | 9.48% | 10.18% | 10.86% | 12.13% | 21.42% | 12.25% | 9.66% | 10.96% | 13.68% | 9.63% | 11.68% | 11.01% |
MEGI NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund | 9.98% | 10.90% | 12.33% | 10.66% | 9.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLQ and MEGI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEGI has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to GLQ (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs MEGI's -39.48%.
GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLQ and MEGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer