PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPGSX vs. BPAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than BPAVX's 9.55% return.


BPGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.43%
6M
4.91%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
10Y*

BPAVX

1D
0.68%
1M
4.71%
YTD
9.55%
6M
12.02%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
2.43%32.86%9.62%16.44%-5.69%
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
9.55%17.17%9.66%12.25%-1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and BPAVX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between BPGSX and BPAVX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. BPAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX
BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BPAVX
BPAVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BPAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPGSXBPAVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.01

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

2.85

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

2.55

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.21

10.07

+8.14

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BPAVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and BPAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPGSXBPAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.01

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.59

+0.23

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum BPAVX drawdown of -49.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and BPAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPGSXBPAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-49.62%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-9.40%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

-14.21%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-5.70%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

2.38%

-1.18%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPGSXBPAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.81%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

9.07%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.38%

11.97%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

15.34%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

18.33%

-3.20%

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAVX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPGSX vs. BPAVX - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than BPAVX's 8.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
8.42%9.22%10.23%10.94%8.42%5.21%1.42%2.34%6.38%4.11%3.70%6.44%
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
80.06%16.14%3.04%1.52%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPGSX and BPAVX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPAVX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGSX dropped -22.19% vs BPAVX's -49.62%.

BPAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPGSX and BPAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer