BPGSX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
BPGSX is managed by Boston Partners. It was launched on Dec 28, 2021. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 2.43% | 32.86% | 9.62% | 16.44% | -5.69% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -1.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return.
BPGSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 24.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BPGSX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
BPGSX
CSUAX
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BPGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.63 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.17 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.36 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 10.32 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BPGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.63 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.55 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between BPGSX and CSUAX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 80.06% | 16.14% | 3.04% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -52.20% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -7.98% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -4.38% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -8.49% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility
BPGSX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BPGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.26% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 6.89% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.25% | 11.48% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 12.89% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 14.89% | +0.48% |