PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPGSX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
2.43%32.86%9.62%16.44%-5.69%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
7.51%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-9.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 7.51% return.


BPGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.43%
6M
6.22%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
10Y*

CAEIX

1D
3.16%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
7.51%
6M
10.19%
1Y
45.58%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX
BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPGSXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

2.50

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

3.25

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

4.01

-2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.89

16.83

-5.94

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and CAEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPGSXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.50

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.04

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and CAEIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than CAEIX's 0.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
80.06%16.14%3.04%1.52%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.67%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and CAEIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BPGSXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-75.81%

+53.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-11.07%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-10.38%

+9.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-49.05%

+44.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.63%

-0.52%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BPGSXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

7.69%

-7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

12.51%

-5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

18.49%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.37%

19.12%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

19.63%

-4.26%