PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAEIX vs. APFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than APFDX's 4.22% return.


CAEIX

1D
2.90%
1M
-2.87%
6M
4.77%
YTD
11.52%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
1.09%

APFDX

1D
1.14%
1M
-5.05%
6M
2.45%
YTD
4.22%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
11.52%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%7.77%
APFDX
Artisan Global Discovery Fund
4.22%12.07%16.11%20.66%-31.14%12.04%45.70%42.57%-2.58%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CAEIX and APFDX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.81

The correlation between CAEIX and APFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAEIX vs. APFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

APFDX
APFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
APFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAEIXAPFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.83

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

3.12

+3.39

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the APFDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAEIX and APFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than APFDX's maximum drawdown of -40.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and APFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAEIXAPFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.81%

-40.83%

-34.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-13.18%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-21.19%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-40.83%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

-6.06%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.28%

-10.58%

-37.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

3.51%

+0.21%

Volatility

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX) at 3.95%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAEIXAPFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

3.95%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

14.86%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

17.63%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

20.76%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

20.44%

-0.88%

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than APFDX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAEIX vs. APFDX - Dividend Comparison

CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than APFDX's 18.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APFDX
Artisan Global Discovery Fund
18.83%19.63%0.87%0.00%0.00%7.91%1.88%0.00%0.51%0.62%0.00%0.00%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.65%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAEIX and APFDX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to APFDX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs APFDX's -40.83%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAEIX and APFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer