BPAY vs. USL
BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BPAY is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 8.49%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for USL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
BPAY vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -12.44% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
BPAY
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -10.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
BPAY vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -12.44% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.39% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | -4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPAY and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.10 |
The correlation between BPAY and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BPAY vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BPAY
USL
Financial Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BPAY
USL
Technology
BPAY
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
BPAY
USL
-
Industrials
BPAY
USL
-
Real Estate
BPAY
USL
-
Basic Materials
BPAY
-
USL
-
Communication Services
BPAY
-
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
BPAY
-
USL
-
Energy
BPAY
-
USL
-
Healthcare
BPAY
-
USL
-
Utilities
BPAY
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPAY vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
BPAY
USL
BPAY vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BPAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.34 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.47 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 7.02 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BPAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 2.04 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.01 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
BPAY vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -89.06% | +55.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.62% | -16.76% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -23.33% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.03% | -38.16% | +12.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -61.46% | +50.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 8.27% | +8.71% |
Volatility
BPAY vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 6.91%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 10.53% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.71% | 23.33% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.01% | 28.54% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 30.08% | -5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 32.35% | -8.00% |
BPAY vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPAY vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.41% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPAY and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to BPAY (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, USL leads with 18.42% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, BPAY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USL has performed better with a 18.42% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BPAY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BPAY and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer