BOW vs. KINS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS).

Performance

BOW vs. KINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOW vs. KINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc	-21.41%	-19.65%	49.24%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-13.16%	11.54%	198.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOW : $754.79M KINS : $209.56M
EPS BOW : $1.59 KINS : $1.02K
PE Ratio BOW : 14.09 KINS : 0.01
PEG Ratio BOW : 0.15 KINS : 0.00
PS Ratio BOW : 1.37 KINS : 0.00
PB Ratio BOW : 1.68 KINS : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) BOW : $551.52M KINS : $56.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOW : -$165.96M KINS : $61.86M
EBITDA (TTM) BOW : $35.44M KINS : $19.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOW achieves a -21.41% return, which is significantly lower than KINS's -13.16% return.

BOW

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: -21.41%
• 6M: -17.05%
• 1Y: -44.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KINS

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: -13.16%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: -11.63%
• 3Y*: 122.46%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOW vs. KINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOW

BOW Risk / Return Rank: 4
BOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 31
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOW vs. KINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOW	KINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.26	-0.23	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	0.02	-1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.00	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	-0.35	-0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	-0.48	-1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOW vs. KINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the KINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOW and KINS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOW	KINS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.26	-0.23	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.02	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between BOW and KINS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BOW vs. KINS - Dividend Comparison

BOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.03%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%

Drawdowns

BOW vs. KINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOW drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, smaller than the maximum KINS drawdown of -99.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOW and KINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOW	KINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.13%	-99.52%	+50.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.60%	-38.84%	-9.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-91.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.79%	-32.10%	-14.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-49.46%	+31.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.84%	27.85%	+2.99%

Volatility

BOW vs. KINS - Volatility Comparison

Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) at 8.23%. This indicates that BOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOW	KINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	8.23%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.32%	22.34%	+5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.73%	51.08%	-15.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.64%	72.50%	-36.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.64%	59.08%	-23.44%

Financials