BOW vs. KINS
BOW (Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc) and KINS (Kingstone Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past year, BOW returned -35.06% vs -2.30% for KINS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOW vs. KINS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOW achieves a -14.79% return, which is significantly lower than KINS's -9.29% return.
BOW
- 1D
- -5.33%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- -14.79%
- 6M
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -35.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KINS
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- -2.30%
- 3Y*
- 122.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
BOW vs. KINS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc | -14.79% | -19.65% | 49.24% |
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc. | -9.29% | 11.54% | 198.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOW and KINS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2024 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
BOW:
$809.46M
KINS:
$219.26M
BOW:
$1.73
KINS:
-$399.22
BOW:
1.40
KINS:
0.00
BOW:
1.77
KINS:
0.00
BOW:
$584.46M
KINS:
$59.92B
BOW:
$181.99M
KINS:
$100.92M
BOW:
$55.51M
KINS:
-$6.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOW vs. KINS — Risk / Return Rank
BOW
KINS
BOW vs. KINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOW | KINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.02 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.10 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -0.21 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOW | KINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | -0.06 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.07 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BOW vs. KINS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOW drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, smaller than the maximum KINS drawdown of -96.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOW and KINS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOW | KINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.13% | -96.97% | +47.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -24.22% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.30% | -29.08% | -13.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.15% | -49.30% | +29.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.20% | 10.82% | +17.38% |
Volatility
BOW vs. KINS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) is 13.81%, while Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) has a volatility of 15.55%. This indicates that BOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOW | KINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.81% | 15.55% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 28.66% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.19% | 39.74% | -3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 72.67% | -36.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 59.33% | -23.44% |
Dividends
BOW vs. KINS - Dividend Comparison
BOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc. | 1.32% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.89% | 3.20% | 2.74% | 4.19% | 2.26% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 2.36% |
Financials
BOW vs. KINS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc and Kingstone Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOW vs. KINS - Profitability Comparison
BOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 155.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KINS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 155.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KINS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc reported a net income of 16.01M and revenue of 155.69M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
KINS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -5.81B and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOW and KINS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KINS has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to BOW (13.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOW dropped -49.13% vs KINS's -96.97%.
KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOW and KINS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer