PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KINS vs. CMCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KINS vs. CMCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly higher than CMCL's -19.36% return.


KINS

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-9.29%
6M
1.91%
1Y
-2.30%
3Y*
122.25%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
7.27%

CMCL

1D
-2.66%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-19.36%
6M
-15.35%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KINS vs. CMCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
-9.29%11.54%613.15%57.78%-72.27%-22.97%-11.56%-54.74%-3.80%20.89%
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
-19.36%186.75%-18.90%2.65%11.39%-23.84%93.29%67.37%-26.33%20.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and CMCL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KINS:

$219.26M

CMCL:

$413.16M

EPS

KINS:

-$399.22

CMCL:

$3.15

PS Ratio

KINS:

0.00

CMCL:

1.50

PB Ratio

KINS:

0.00

CMCL:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

KINS:

$59.92B

CMCL:

$274.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KINS:

$100.92M

CMCL:

$142.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

KINS:

-$6.57B

CMCL:

$137.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KINS vs. CMCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS
KINS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCL
CMCL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CMCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. CMCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KINSCMCLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.32

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.20

0.84

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.11

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

0.47

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

0.87

-1.08

KINS vs. CMCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the CMCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and CMCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KINSCMCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.32

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.23

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.35

-0.28

Drawdowns

KINS vs. CMCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, which is greater than CMCL's maximum drawdown of -65.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and CMCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KINSCMCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.97%

-65.77%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.22%

-43.76%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.84%

-45.27%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.00%

-50.00%

-41.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.08%

-43.76%

+14.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.30%

-35.77%

-13.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.82%

23.89%

-13.07%

Volatility

KINS vs. CMCL - Volatility Comparison

Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) at 13.52%. This indicates that KINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KINSCMCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

13.52%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.66%

47.57%

-18.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.74%

65.17%

-25.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.67%

52.60%

+20.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.33%

54.57%

+4.76%

Dividends

KINS vs. CMCL - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than CMCL's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
2.69%2.14%5.95%4.59%4.52%4.29%2.11%3.27%5.23%1.86%0.00%0.00%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
1.32%0.59%0.00%0.00%8.89%3.20%2.74%4.19%2.26%1.61%1.82%2.36%

Financials

KINS vs. CMCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
59.78B
66.43M
(KINS) Total Revenue
(CMCL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KINS vs. CMCL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
48.3%
Portfolio components
KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMCL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 32.10M and revenue of 66.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CMCL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported an operating income of 26.87M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.4%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -5.81B and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.

CMCL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a net income of 15.85M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KINS and CMCL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KINS has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to CMCL (13.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs CMCL's -65.77%.

CMCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KINS and CMCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer