BOW vs. VTI
BOW (Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc) is a stock, while VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Over the past year, BOW returned -35.06% vs 28.18% for VTI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOW vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOW achieves a -14.79% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.
BOW
- 1D
- -5.33%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- -14.79%
- 6M
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -35.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
BOW vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc | -14.79% | -19.65% | 49.24% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOW and VTI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOW vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
BOW
VTI
BOW vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOW | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.42 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 3.17 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 14.62 | -15.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOW | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 2.33 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.51 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
BOW vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOW drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOW and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOW | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.13% | -55.45% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -8.92% | -33.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.30% | -0.72% | -41.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.15% | -8.03% | -12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.20% | 1.93% | +26.27% |
Volatility
BOW vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc (BOW) has a higher volatility of 13.81% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that BOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOW | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.81% | 2.96% | +10.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 9.13% | +17.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.19% | 12.17% | +24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 17.40% | +18.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 18.30% | +17.59% |
Dividends
BOW vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
BOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOW Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOW and VTI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOW has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOW dropped -49.13% vs VTI's -55.45%.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOW and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer