BOUT vs. VOT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BOUT tracks the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index while VOT tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOUT returned 7.04%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for VOT. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BOUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

BOUT vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 27.36% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 6.22% return.

BOUT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 19.69%
• YTD: 27.36%
• 1Y: 26.50%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.61%

VOT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 11.66%
• ALL TIME*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	$64.60K	$107.52K	$108.59K
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	$53.27M	$59.32M	$61.74M

BOUT vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	27.36%	-6.77%	18.82%	13.27%	-22.60%	22.69%	50.56%	20.59%	-30.42%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	6.22%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BOUT and VOT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018	0.77

The correlation between BOUT and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOUT vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOUT	VOT
Financial Services	37.6%	6.0%
Technology	26.9%	33.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	10.8%
Basic Materials	8.1%	1.6%
Healthcare	7.8%	8.0%
Utilities	7.0%	2.9%
Industrials	5.4%	26.7%
Real Estate	4.3%	4.2%
Communication Services	3.3%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	0.7%
Energy	0.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BOUT vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOUT

BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 46
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 13
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOUT vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOUT	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.13	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	0.30	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.03	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	0.14	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	0.40	+5.34

BOUT vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOUT and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOUT vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOUT	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.98%	-60.16%	+23.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-15.96%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.31%	-21.77%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.28%	-37.19%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-3.52%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	-9.90%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	5.42%	-1.23%

Volatility

BOUT vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.19%. This indicates that BOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOUT	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	4.19%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	13.89%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.61%	17.20%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	21.56%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	21.02%	+1.95%

BOUT vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOUT vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than VOT's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	0.27%	0.34%	0.60%	1.32%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOUT and VOT in my portfolio?

BOUT and VOT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOUT or VOT?

BOUT has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to VOT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOUT dropped -36.98% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which ETF is better, BOUT or VOT?

On 5-year performance, BOUT leads with 7.04% vs 4.89% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOUT or VOT?

Over the 5-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOUT or VOT?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOUT or VOT?

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.27% for BOUT.

What is the main difference between BOUT and VOT?

BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.05% for VOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.