PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOUT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOUT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 31.39% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


BOUT

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.39%
6M
30.30%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOUT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
31.39%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%22.69%50.56%20.59%-29.80%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BOUT and VOO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018

0.73

The correlation between BOUT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOUT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOUT
VOO

Technology

28.4%
35.7%

Financial Services

22.9%
11.6%

Basic Materials

9.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
4.9%

Industrials

9.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.2%

Utilities

7.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
8.5%

Communication Services

2.0%
11.3%

Technology

BOUT
28.4%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

BOUT
22.9%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

BOUT
9.9%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

BOUT
9.7%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

BOUT
9.7%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BOUT
8.5%
VOO
10.2%

Utilities

BOUT
7.0%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

BOUT
3.5%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

BOUT
3.1%
VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

BOUT
2.6%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

BOUT
2.0%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOUT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOUT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOUTVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.16

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

14.73

-5.73

BOUT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOUT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOUTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.39

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.83

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.89

-0.48

Drawdowns

BOUT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOUTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-33.99%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-8.90%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

-18.69%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

-24.52%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.70%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-3.69%

-8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

1.91%

+2.02%

Volatility

BOUT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that BOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOUTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

2.84%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

8.90%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

11.80%

+8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

16.81%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.93%

18.01%

+4.92%

BOUT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOUT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOUT and VOO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOUT dropped -36.75% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 8.25% for BOUT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.26% for BOUT.

BOUT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOUT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer