BOTZ vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOTZ returned 3.18%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for QYLD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	11.15%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and QYLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016	0.69

The correlation between BOTZ and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTZ	QYLD
Industrials	48.6%	2.8%
Technology	31.8%	53.8%
Healthcare	9.0%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	12.3%
Communication Services	4.5%	15.8%
Financial Services	0.9%	0.2%
Energy	0.5%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	0.0%	1.1%
Utilities	0.0%	1.4%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTZ	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.80	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	3.92	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.63	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	4.84	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	28.36	-23.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTZ	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	2.80	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.58	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.59	-0.15

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-24.75%	-30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	-4.97%	-14.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	-19.06%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	-24.61%	-30.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-0.06%	-3.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.32%	-3.84%	-14.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	0.85%	+4.78%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	1.85%	+5.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.40%	7.12%	+11.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.98%	8.58%	+15.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.73%	14.70%	+12.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.73%	15.49%	+10.24%

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ and QYLD in my portfolio?

BOTZ and QYLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTZ or QYLD?

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ or QYLD?

On 5-year performance, QYLD leads with 8.43% vs 3.18% for BOTZ. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTZ or QYLD?

Over the 5-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTZ or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between BOTZ and QYLD?

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.