PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BOTZ at 1.05% and MSTZ at 1.05%.


BOTZ

1D
0.08%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
1.05%
6M
0.24%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
19.27%
1M
186.45%
YTD
1.05%
6M
9.89%
1Y
279.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and MSTZ is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

3.31

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

6.57

-3.80

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-99.38%

+43.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-84.89%

+65.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.06%

-96.56%

+84.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-94.46%

+76.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

42.70%

-36.60%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 9.78%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

46.08%

-36.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.00%

129.73%

-109.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.43%

145.84%

-120.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

170.65%

-143.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

170.65%

-144.83%

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to BOTZ (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs 16.86% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer