BOTZ vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOTZ returned 1.51%/yr vs 4.01%/yr for LIT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

BOTZ vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 27.00% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: —

LIT

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 27.00%
• 6M: 29.31%
• 1Y: 124.44%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: 4.01%
• 10Y*: 14.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	2.46%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	27.00%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and LIT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016	0.62

The correlation between BOTZ and LIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOTZ vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTZ	LIT
Industrials	49.3%	25.0%
Technology	31.8%	16.0%
Healthcare	8.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	9.1%
Communication Services	4.4%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	49.9%
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 25
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 94
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTZ	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	3.57	-2.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	3.94	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.52	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	7.36	-6.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.26	27.27	-24.01

BOTZ vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-65.91%	+10.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	-16.46%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	-53.01%	+23.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	-65.91%	+10.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.83%	-11.21%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.29%	-33.59%	+15.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	4.45%	+1.39%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 8.89%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	11.56%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.49%	23.80%	-4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.07%	33.94%	-8.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.90%	32.04%	-5.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.79%	30.77%	-4.98%

BOTZ vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than LIT's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.64%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.38%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ and LIT in my portfolio?

BOTZ and LIT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTZ or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to BOTZ (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ or LIT?

On 5-year performance, LIT leads with 4.01% vs 1.51% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTZ or LIT?

Over the 5-year period, LIT has performed better with a 4.01% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ or LIT?

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTZ or LIT?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.38% for LIT.

What is the main difference between BOTZ and LIT?

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while LIT is Lithium & Battery Metals. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.75% for LIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.