PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTT vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOTT vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOTT vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
10.26%55.56%10.74%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
18.28%19.98%-0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 18.28% return.


BOTT

1D
2.27%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
10.26%
6M
16.43%
1Y
83.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TINY

1D
2.69%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
18.28%
6M
20.16%
1Y
67.56%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOTT vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOTT vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT
BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTTTINYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.90

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.55

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

4.02

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.46

13.50

-4.05

BOTT vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and TINY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTTTINYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.90

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.35

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and TINY is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BOTT vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TINY's 0.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
0.12%0.14%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.25%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and TINY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTTTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.74%

-43.79%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.74%

-16.75%

-13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.20%

-10.15%

-16.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-16.68%

+10.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.84%

4.99%

+3.85%

Volatility

BOTT vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) is 11.91%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that BOTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOTTTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

13.37%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.52%

25.02%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.67%

35.65%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.68%

32.08%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

32.08%

+0.60%