BOTT vs. PSI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTT is a Robotics fund tracking the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 72.18% vs 207.41% for PSI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.

Performance

BOTT vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 6M: 21.97%
• 1Y: 72.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSI

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 13.19%
• YTD: 112.90%
• 6M: 110.54%
• 1Y: 207.41%
• 3Y*: 55.80%
• 5Y*: 32.57%
• 10Y*: 34.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	17.49%	55.56%	10.73%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	112.90%	36.32%	15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and PSI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.72

The correlation between BOTT and PSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOTT vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTT	PSI
Industrials	53.9%	1.6%
Technology	29.4%	98.4%
Consumer Cyclical	16.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-
Financial Services	-0.0%	-

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 55
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	PSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	4.92	-3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	4.57	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.63	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	12.90	-10.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	45.29	-39.39

BOTT vs. PSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the PSI Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and PSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and PSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	PSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-62.96%	+32.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-15.48%	-15.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.37%	0.00%	-21.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-15.92%	+9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.86%	4.40%	+7.46%

Volatility

BOTT vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) is 10.84%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that BOTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	PSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.84%	18.89%	-8.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	33.67%	-1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.77%	40.58%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.47%	38.44%	-4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.47%	35.42%	-1.95%

BOTT vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTT vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.04%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and PSI in my portfolio?

BOTT and PSI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTT or PSI?

PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to BOTT (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs PSI's -62.96%.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or PSI?

On 1-year performance, PSI leads with 207.41% vs 72.18% for BOTT. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BOTT has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or PSI?

Over the 1-year period, PSI has performed better with a 207.41% return vs 72.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or PSI?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or PSI?

BOTT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.

What is the main difference between BOTT and PSI?

BOTT is categorized as Robotics, while PSI is Semiconductors. BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.56% for PSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.