PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTT vs. JIVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTT vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than JIVE's 16.59% return.


BOTT

1D
-1.88%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
17.49%
6M
21.97%
1Y
72.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JIVE

1D
0.63%
1M
3.13%
YTD
16.59%
6M
19.20%
1Y
42.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOTT
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF
17.49%55.56%10.73%
JIVE
Jpmorgan International Value ETF
16.59%49.80%5.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and JIVE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024

0.57

The correlation between BOTT and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTT vs. JIVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTT
JIVE

Industrials

53.9%
10.2%

Technology

29.4%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

5.7%

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

10.7%

Healthcare

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

-0.0%
37.6%

Industrials

BOTT
53.9%
JIVE
10.2%

Technology

BOTT
29.4%
JIVE
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTT
16.6%
JIVE
6.2%

Basic Materials

BOTT

-

JIVE
5.7%

Communication Services

BOTT

-

JIVE
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

BOTT

-

JIVE
4.3%

Energy

BOTT

-

JIVE
10.7%

Healthcare

BOTT

-

JIVE
4.5%

Real Estate

BOTT

-

JIVE
2.4%

Utilities

BOTT

-

JIVE
2.4%

Financial Services

BOTT
-0.0%
JIVE
37.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTT vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT
BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JIVE
JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTTJIVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.89

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

14.92

-9.02

BOTT vs. JIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the JIVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and JIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and JIVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTTJIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.74%

-13.79%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.74%

-10.57%

-20.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.37%

-0.30%

-21.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-1.96%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

2.76%

+9.10%

Volatility

BOTT vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison

Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) at 5.61%. This indicates that BOTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTTJIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

5.61%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.73%

12.71%

+19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.77%

15.07%

+22.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

15.11%

+18.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.47%

15.11%

+18.36%

BOTT vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTT vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than JIVE's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BOTT
Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF
0.12%0.14%1.74%0.00%
JIVE
Jpmorgan International Value ETF
2.47%2.88%2.48%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTT and JIVE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTT has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to JIVE (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs JIVE's -13.79%.

On 1-year performance, BOTT leads with 72.18% vs 42.72% for JIVE. On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JIVE has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOTT has performed better with a 72.18% return vs 42.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIVE.

JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.12% for BOTT.

BOTT is categorized as Robotics, while JIVE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.55% for JIVE.

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTT and JIVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer