BOTT vs. AGMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTT is a Robotics fund tracking the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while AGMI is a Silver fund tracking the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 84.77% vs 112.77% for AGMI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

BOTT vs. AGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 25.46% return, which is significantly higher than AGMI's 7.60% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 25.46%
• 6M: 37.71%
• 1Y: 84.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGMI

• 1D: -4.74%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 20.09%
• 1Y: 112.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. AGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	25.46%	55.56%	6.10%
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	7.60%	176.11%	-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and AGMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024	0.43

BOTT vs. AGMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTT	AGMI
Industrials	41.2%	-
Technology	17.9%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-
Financial Services	-0.0%	-

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. AGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 58
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

AGMI

AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 60
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. AGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTT	AGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.32	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.52	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.41	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	9.21	-1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTT vs. AGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AGMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and AGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTT	AGMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.32	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.56	-0.23

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. AGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum AGMI drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and AGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	AGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-33.26%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-33.26%	+2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.03%	-22.35%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-9.14%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.40%	12.29%	-0.89%

Volatility

BOTT vs. AGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) is 11.00%, while Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a volatility of 17.62%. This indicates that BOTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	AGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.00%	17.62%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.00%	40.98%	-9.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.02%	48.95%	-11.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.32%	44.04%	-10.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.32%	44.04%	-10.72%

BOTT vs. AGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTT and AGMI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

BOTT vs. AGMI - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AGMI's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	4.12%	4.43%	1.81%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.11%	0.14%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and AGMI in my portfolio?

BOTT and AGMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTT or AGMI?

AGMI has higher volatility (17.62%) compared to BOTT (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs AGMI's -33.26%.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or AGMI?

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 112.77% vs 84.77% for BOTT. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, BOTT has been the lower-risk option at 11.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or AGMI?

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 112.77% return vs 84.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or AGMI?

BOTT and AGMI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or AGMI?

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.11% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between BOTT and AGMI?

BOTT is categorized as Robotics, while AGMI is Silver. BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while AGMI tracks STOXX Global Silver Mining Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.