AGMI vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
AGMI and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on May 2, 2024. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both AGMI and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGMI or GLDM.
Correlation
The correlation between AGMI and GLDM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AGMI vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AGMI:
39.56%
GLDM:
16.86%
AGMI:
-25.10%
GLDM:
-21.63%
AGMI:
-4.28%
GLDM:
-3.02%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AGMI having a 26.49% return and GLDM slightly higher at 26.51%.
AGMI
26.49%
1.82%
-2.55%
N/A
N/A
N/A
GLDM
26.51%
7.77%
19.71%
42.05%
14.40%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGMI vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGMI vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AGMI
GLDM
AGMI vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
AGMI vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | 1.44% | 1.82% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGMI vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGMI vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 16.88% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.32%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.