BOOT vs. IAU
BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 10 years, BOOT returned 36.37%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for IAU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BOOT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 36.37%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.
BOOT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 16.57%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -16.66%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
BOOT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -3.32% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | -2.63% | 161.48% | 2.53% | 32.67% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -2.44% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and IAU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
BOOT
IAU
BOOT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOOT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.99 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 2.83 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.73% | -45.14% | -38.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -24.40% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -24.40% | -24.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.62% | -24.40% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.88% | -24.40% | -53.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.97% | -22.03% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -15.97% | -16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.87% | 8.47% | +5.40% |
Volatility
BOOT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.70%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOOT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 7.70% | +6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 23.94% | +9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.52% | 27.17% | +16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.90% | 18.16% | +31.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.02% | 16.02% | +41.00% |
Dividends
BOOT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOOT nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOOT and IAU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOOT has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs IAU's -45.14%.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOOT and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer