BOOT vs. FLMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, BOOT returned 18.51%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for FLMI. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

BOOT vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than FLMI's 2.31% return.

BOOT

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: -3.28%
• 6M: -15.10%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: 35.80%
• 5Y*: 18.51%
• 10Y*: 35.75%

FLMI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 6.02%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOOT vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	-3.28%	16.24%	97.79%	22.78%	-49.19%	183.79%	-2.63%	161.48%	2.53%	103.06%
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	2.31%	5.89%	4.91%	7.89%	-10.23%	4.06%	6.11%	6.71%	0.29%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and FLMI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	-0.00

The correlation between BOOT and FLMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BOOT vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOT

BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 43
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FLMI

FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 75
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOT vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOOT	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	2.69	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	4.06	-3.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.61	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	2.87	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.42	10.34	-9.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOOT vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOOT	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	2.69	-2.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.50	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.65	-0.30

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and FLMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOOT	FLMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.73%	-14.66%	-69.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.01%	-2.90%	-32.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.93%	-5.31%	-43.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.62%	-14.66%	-45.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.93%	-0.33%	-17.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.35%	-2.82%	-29.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.54%	0.80%	+12.74%

Volatility

BOOT vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 15.75% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 1.00%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOOT	FLMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.75%	1.00%	+14.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.56%	2.03%	+30.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.81%	3.09%	+39.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.78%	4.45%	+45.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.03%	4.72%	+52.31%

Dividends

BOOT vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	3.87%	3.89%	4.08%	3.71%	3.08%	2.22%	2.09%	2.71%	2.41%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOOT and FLMI in my portfolio?

BOOT and FLMI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOOT or FLMI?

BOOT has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to FLMI (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.