PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLMI vs. CGMU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLMI and CGMU is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FLMI vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.52%
0.66%
FLMI
CGMU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLMI:

1.16

CGMU:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

FLMI:

1.72

CGMU:

1.13

Omega Ratio

FLMI:

1.23

CGMU:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FLMI:

1.24

CGMU:

1.12

Martin Ratio

FLMI:

6.34

CGMU:

3.43

Ulcer Index

FLMI:

0.82%

CGMU:

0.80%

Daily Std Dev

FLMI:

4.47%

CGMU:

3.40%

Max Drawdown

FLMI:

-14.66%

CGMU:

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

FLMI:

-1.81%

CGMU:

-1.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMI achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than CGMU's 0.04% return.


FLMI

YTD

0.02%

1M

-0.32%

6M

1.52%

1Y

4.89%

5Y*

2.16%

10Y*

N/A

CGMU

YTD

0.04%

1M

-0.48%

6M

0.66%

1Y

2.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLMI vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.


FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLMI: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for CGMU: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLMI vs. CGMU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLMI is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLMI is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLMI is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLMI is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLMI is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLMI is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGMU is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGMU is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGMU is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGMU is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGMU is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGMU is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLMI vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.160.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.721.13
The chart of Omega ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.231.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.991.12
The chart of Martin ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 6.34, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.343.43
FLMI
CGMU

The current FLMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMI and CGMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.16
0.81
FLMI
CGMU

Dividends

FLMI vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

FLMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than CGMU's 2.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
4.09%4.09%3.71%3.09%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.00%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
2.87%2.87%3.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLMI vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMI drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMI and CGMU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.81%
-1.72%
FLMI
CGMU

Volatility

FLMI vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 1.10%. This indicates that FLMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.40%
1.10%
FLMI
CGMU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab