PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. SOCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOIL vs. SOCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -38.60% return, which is significantly lower than SOCL's -23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed SOCL with an annualized return of -57.67%, while SOCL has yielded a comparatively higher 7.96% annualized return.


BOIL

1D
4.15%
1M
10.36%
YTD
-38.60%
6M
-41.10%
1Y
-72.68%
3Y*
-66.02%
5Y*
-66.45%
10Y*
-57.67%

SOCL

1D
-0.72%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-22.97%
1Y
-20.93%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
-9.67%
10Y*
7.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOIL vs. SOCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-38.60%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-67.70%-20.55%-65.72%
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
-23.22%31.04%5.08%31.08%-42.23%-12.84%78.35%25.74%-16.39%54.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and SOCL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011

0.01

The correlation between BOIL and SOCL shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOIL vs. SOCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SOCL
SOCL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SOCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOCL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOCL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOIL vs. SOCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOILSOCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.87

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.63

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.24

-0.06

BOIL vs. SOCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the SOCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and SOCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. SOCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SOCL's maximum drawdown of -68.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and SOCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOILSOCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-68.70%

-31.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.43%

-33.52%

-43.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.86%

-33.52%

-63.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

-66.32%

-33.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-68.70%

-31.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-44.84%

-55.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.59%

-22.03%

-71.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.95%

16.95%

+39.00%

Volatility

BOIL vs. SOCL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 22.78% compared to Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) at 9.71%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOILSOCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.78%

9.71%

+13.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.55%

19.15%

+85.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.22%

24.03%

+89.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.95%

29.84%

+89.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.83%

27.60%

+74.23%

BOIL vs. SOCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SOCL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOIL vs. SOCL - Dividend Comparison

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
0.56%0.43%0.25%0.61%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.49%0.18%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOIL and SOCL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to SOCL (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs SOCL's -68.70%.

On 10-year performance, SOCL leads with 7.96% vs -57.67% for BOIL. On fees, SOCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOCL has performed better with a 7.96% return vs -57.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.

BOIL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SOCL is Large Cap Growth Equities. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.65% for SOCL.

BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and SOCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer