BOAT vs. XTN
BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) and XTN (SPDR S&P Transportation ETF) are both Transportation Equities funds - BOAT tracks the Solactive Global Shipping Index - Benchmark TR Net while XTN tracks the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOAT returned 27.56%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for XTN. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOAT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTN.
Performance
BOAT vs. XTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOAT achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than XTN's 21.64% return.
BOAT
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 29.73%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 49.09%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTN
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 22.93%
- 1Y
- 44.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
BOAT vs. XTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 29.73% | 22.77% | 5.97% | 24.53% | 6.26% | 23.18% |
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 21.64% | 6.33% | 4.86% | 25.22% | -28.10% | 15.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOAT and XTN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between BOAT and XTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BOAT vs. XTN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOAT
XTN
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
BOAT
XTN
Energy
BOAT
XTN
-
Financial Services
BOAT
XTN
-
Basic Materials
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Communication Services
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Consumer Cyclical
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Consumer Defensive
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Healthcare
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Real Estate
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Technology
BOAT
-
XTN
Utilities
BOAT
-
XTN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOAT vs. XTN — Risk / Return Rank
BOAT
XTN
BOAT vs. XTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) and SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOAT | XTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 2.59 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 7.14 | +5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOAT | XTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 1.60 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.44 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
BOAT vs. XTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum XTN drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOAT and XTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOAT | XTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -43.77% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -17.28% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.94% | -33.69% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -5.70% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -10.94% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 6.25% | -2.50% |
Volatility
BOAT vs. XTN - Volatility Comparison
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) and SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) have volatilities of 7.60% and 7.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOAT | XTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.60% | 7.36% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 22.05% | -6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 28.03% | -8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 26.83% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 26.19% | -1.07% |
BOAT vs. XTN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOAT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XTN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOAT vs. XTN - Dividend Comparison
BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than XTN's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 6.32% | 8.08% | 13.89% | 13.65% | 13.57% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 0.63% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOAT and XTN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOAT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to XTN (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOAT dropped -33.94% vs XTN's -43.77%.
On 3-year performance, BOAT leads with 27.56% vs 14.95% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 27.56% return vs 14.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.66% for XTN.
BOAT tracks Solactive Global Shipping Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BOAT and 0.35% for XTN.
BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOAT and XTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer