BNO vs. SPIB
BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) and SPIB (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures, while SPIB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BNO returned 12.76%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for SPIB. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BNO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPIB.
Performance
BNO vs. SPIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 66.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPIB's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has outperformed SPIB with an annualized return of 12.76%, while SPIB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.
BNO
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 55.35%
- YTD
- 66.98%
- 1Y
- 55.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
SPIB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
BNO vs. SPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 66.98% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.42% | 7.91% | 4.28% | 7.27% | -9.65% | -1.24% | 7.69% | 10.23% | -0.49% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNO and SPIB is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010 | -0.08 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BNO and SPIB has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNO vs. SPIB — Risk / Return Rank
BNO
SPIB
BNO vs. SPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNO | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.04 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 6.70 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNO vs. SPIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than SPIB's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and SPIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNO | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -14.94% | -72.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.46% | -2.02% | -32.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.46% | -3.12% | -31.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.46% | -14.80% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -14.94% | -60.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.35% | -0.82% | -20.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.06% | -1.90% | -38.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.71% | 0.61% | +11.10% |
Volatility
BNO vs. SPIB - Volatility Comparison
United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) at 0.85%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNO | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.79% | 0.85% | +14.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.17% | 2.26% | +36.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.76% | 2.86% | +39.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 4.48% | +31.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.78% | 4.60% | +32.18% |
BNO vs. SPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIB's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNO vs. SPIB - Dividend Comparison
BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNO and SPIB have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to SPIB (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNO dropped -87.06% vs SPIB's -14.94%.
On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 12.76% vs 2.74% for SPIB. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
SPIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
BNO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SPIB is Corporate Bonds. BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures, while SPIB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BNO and 0.04% for SPIB.
SPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNO and SPIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer