BNKU vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 119.44% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

BNKU vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

BNKU

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 29.65%
• YTD: 24.58%
• 6M: 18.43%
• 1Y: 119.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	24.58%	34.97%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	-4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and UGA is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.04

The correlation between BNKU and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 57
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 49

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKU	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.73	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.25	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.17	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	9.39	-1.68

BNKU vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -61.21%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.21%	-86.59%	+25.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-18.96%	-22.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.05%	+18.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-36.69%	+18.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.55%	6.43%	+9.12%

Volatility

BNKU vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) has a higher volatility of 16.22% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that BNKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.22%	9.24%	+6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.27%	30.57%	+15.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.74%	35.22%	+22.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.83%	34.45%	+38.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.83%	37.22%	+35.61%

BNKU vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKU nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and UGA in my portfolio?

BNKU and UGA have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or UGA?

BNKU has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -61.21% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or UGA?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 119.44% vs 59.74% for UGA. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 119.44% return vs 59.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or UGA?

BNKU and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKU and UGA?

BNKU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.