BNKU vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. BNKU is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 92.66% vs 16.72% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

BNKU vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than RSBY's 17.89% return.

BNKU

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 12.81%
• 6M: 18.36%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 1Y: 92.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 17.58%
• YTD: 17.89%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	29.57%	34.97%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	17.89%	-6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and RSBY is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 54
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKU	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.48	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.15	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.11	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	4.94	+1.04

BNKU vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -61.21%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.21%	-23.32%	-37.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-7.95%	-33.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-6.95%	+4.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-13.33%	-3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.55%	3.40%	+12.15%

Volatility

BNKU vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) has a higher volatility of 17.34% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.12%. This indicates that BNKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.34%	3.12%	+14.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.43%	8.38%	+38.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.62%	11.41%	+47.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.40%	13.37%	+59.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.40%	13.37%	+59.03%

BNKU vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.76%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and RSBY in my portfolio?

BNKU and RSBY have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or RSBY?

BNKU has higher volatility (17.34%) compared to RSBY (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -61.21% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 92.66% vs 16.72% for RSBY. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 92.66% return vs 16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or RSBY?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between BNKU and RSBY?

BNKU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.