BNKU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BNKU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

BNKU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 562.84% return.

BNKU

• 1D: -3.18%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 85.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: 9.00%
• 1M: 30.35%
• YTD: 562.84%
• 6M: 362.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	-1.60%	31.66%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	562.84%	5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and LINT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.13

BNKU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKU	LINT
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 39
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	24.05	-23.59

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.03%	-49.54%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.59%	-26.55%	+9.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-20.51%	+3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.70%	163.04%	-106.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.86%	163.04%	-90.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.86%	163.04%	-90.18%

BNKU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.13%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and LINT in my portfolio?

BNKU and LINT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or LINT?

On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or LINT?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between BNKU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 0.97% for LINT.