BNKD vs. HDGE
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. BNKD is passively managed, while HDGE is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -70.64% vs -2.83% for HDGE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
BNKD vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -46.93% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's -0.75% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- -21.61%
- 6M
- -46.27%
- YTD
- -46.93%
- 1Y
- -70.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -2.83%
- 3Y*
- -2.90%
- 5Y*
- -4.46%
- 10Y*
- -15.07%
BNKD vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -46.93% | -59.47% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | -0.75% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and HDGE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BNKD and HDGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
BNKD vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNKD
HDGE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BNKD
HDGE
Basic Materials
BNKD
-
HDGE
Communication Services
BNKD
-
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
BNKD
-
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
BNKD
-
HDGE
Energy
BNKD
-
HDGE
Healthcare
BNKD
-
HDGE
Industrials
BNKD
-
HDGE
Real Estate
BNKD
-
HDGE
Technology
BNKD
-
HDGE
Utilities
BNKD
-
HDGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
HDGE
BNKD vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNKD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.99 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.18 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -0.43 | -1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -89.57%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.57% | -93.88% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.65% | -15.40% | -55.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.57% | -93.48% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.70% | -70.26% | +4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.63% | 6.61% | +35.02% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.12%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 6.12% | +10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.12% | 13.78% | +33.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.14% | 18.46% | +40.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.43% | 24.25% | +49.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.43% | 23.44% | +49.99% |
BNKD vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.52% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and HDGE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNKD has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to HDGE (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -89.57% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 1-year performance, HDGE leads with -2.83% vs -70.64% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -2.83% return vs -70.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
They also come from different issuers: REX and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer