BNDW vs. GGOV
BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNDW charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
BNDW vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDW achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.47% return.
BNDW
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDW vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 0.68% | 1.99% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.47% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDW and GGOV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDW vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
BNDW
GGOV
BNDW vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNDW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.08 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
BNDW vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDW drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDW and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.22% | -4.69% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.34% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -1.59% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
BNDW vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDW | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 5.39% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 5.39% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 5.39% | -0.49% |
BNDW vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDW has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDW vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.20% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDW and GGOV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
BNDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDW and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for BNDW and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer