BNDP vs. VT
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
BNDP vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.34% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
BNDP vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.25% | 0.08% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.34% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and VT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
BNDP vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -50.27% | +47.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -1.67% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -6.98% | +6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 13.67% | -9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.68% | 16.20% | -12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.68% | 17.16% | -13.48% |
BNDP vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.45% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and VT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.
BNDP has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.59% for VT.
BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VT is Global Equities. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer