BNDP vs. MBS
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. BNDP is passively managed, while MBS is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.
Performance
BNDP vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.62% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and MBS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
MBS
BNDP vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.60 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and MBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -4.09% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -1.46% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -1.02% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.70% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63% | 2.93% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 3.99% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 3.99% | -0.36% |
BNDP vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDP vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.61% | 5.28% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and MBS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.
MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.49% for MBS.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer