MBS vs. SGOV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. MBS is actively managed, while SGOV is passively managed. Over the past year, MBS returned 6.13% vs 3.93% for SGOV. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.

Performance

MBS vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBS achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.70% return.

MBS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGOV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBS vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.86%	8.13%	5.84%
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF	1.70%	4.24%	4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MBS and SGOV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024	0.06

The correlation between MBS and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MBS vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 66
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

SGOV

SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBS vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBS	SGOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	20.38	-18.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	274.27	-270.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	194.55	-193.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	396.11	-393.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.16	4,438.60	-4,430.43

MBS vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBS and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBS vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBS drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBS and SGOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBS	SGOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-0.03%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.20%	-0.01%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	0.00%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-0.00%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.00%	+0.75%

Volatility

MBS vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that MBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBS	SGOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	0.06%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.04%	0.13%	+1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	0.19%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.97%	0.24%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.97%	0.24%	+3.73%

MBS vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBS vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.60%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF	3.85%	4.10%	5.10%	4.87%	1.45%	0.03%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBS and SGOV in my portfolio?

MBS and SGOV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBS or SGOV?

MBS has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBS dropped -4.09% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

Which ETF is better, MBS or SGOV?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.13% vs 3.93% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MBS or SGOV?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBS or SGOV?

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBS or SGOV?

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

What is the main difference between MBS and SGOV?

MBS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MBS and 0.09% for SGOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.38 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.