MBS vs. MNDO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO).

MBS is an actively managed fund by Angel Oak. It was launched on Jun 4, 2021.

Performance

MBS vs. MNDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBS vs. MNDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.29%	8.13%	5.78%
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd	-0.00%	-34.77%	3.85%

Returns By Period

MBS

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 5.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNDO

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -4.17%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: -35.39%
• 3Y*: -10.01%
• 5Y*: -8.21%
• 10Y*: 4.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MBS vs. MNDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 77
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

MNDO

MNDO Risk / Return Rank: 9
MNDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MNDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MNDO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MNDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MNDO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBS vs. MNDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBS	MNDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-1.02	+2.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	-1.46	+3.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.82	+0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	-0.86	+3.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	-1.22	+7.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBS vs. MNDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the MNDO Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBS and MNDO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBS	MNDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	-1.02	+2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.66	0.05	+1.61

Correlation

The correlation between MBS and MNDO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

MBS vs. MNDO - Dividend Comparison

MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.47%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd	0.00%	19.13%	12.15%	12.24%	12.38%	8.37%	9.27%	10.79%	13.16%	11.55%	10.98%	11.86%

Drawdowns

MBS vs. MNDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBS drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum MNDO drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBS and MNDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBS	MNDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-94.28%	+90.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-41.81%	+39.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-53.02%	+51.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-46.63%	+45.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	29.62%	-28.71%

Volatility

MBS vs. MNDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) is 1.01%, while MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that MBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBS	MNDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	6.97%	-5.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.02%	23.30%	-21.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	34.79%	-31.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	27.76%	-23.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	26.09%	-22.01%