BNDP vs. ICVT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT).

BNDP and ICVT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNDP is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2025. ICVT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2015. Both BNDP and ICVT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BNDP vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNDP vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	-0.18%	0.10%
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	4.76%	-1.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 4.76% return.

BNDP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICVT

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: 4.76%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 24.91%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDP vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ICVT

iShares Convertible Bond ETF

BNDP

Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

BNDP vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICVT

ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDP vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNDP	ICVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.68	-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between BNDP and ICVT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BNDP vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ICVT's 1.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	1.32%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	1.59%	1.73%	2.19%	1.85%	1.93%	7.70%	3.98%	1.86%	4.82%	2.56%	3.06%	1.57%

Drawdowns

BNDP vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.56%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and ICVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDP	ICVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-33.25%	+30.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-2.57%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-9.64%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BNDP	ICVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63%	14.06%	-10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	13.20%	-9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	15.54%	-11.91%