PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICVT vs. JAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 26.89% return, which is significantly higher than JAAAX's 5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ICVT has outperformed JAAAX with an annualized return of 14.40%, while JAAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.22% annualized return.


ICVT

1D
0.02%
1M
5.09%
YTD
26.89%
6M
24.71%
1Y
43.39%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
14.40%

JAAAX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.55%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
26.89%18.10%10.61%15.35%-20.66%-0.66%61.01%21.76%-0.27%16.38%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
5.59%6.18%6.59%5.85%-3.12%4.77%4.36%8.95%-4.09%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ICVT and JAAAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2015

0.62

The correlation between ICVT and JAAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICVT vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAAX
JAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICVTJAAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.59

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

5.06

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.71

19.35

+0.36

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the JAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICVT and JAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than JAAAX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and JAAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICVTJAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-15.72%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-2.02%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-5.66%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.95%

-6.28%

-23.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-12.64%

-20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-2.04%

-7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.53%

+1.68%

Volatility

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 1.10%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICVTJAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

1.10%

+5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

2.63%

+10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

3.40%

+12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

4.22%

+9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

4.38%

+11.23%

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICVT vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison

ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than JAAAX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.28%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
1.45%1.53%1.17%1.71%3.02%1.72%0.74%3.38%1.99%1.23%0.77%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICVT and JAAAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICVT has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to JAAAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICVT dropped -33.25% vs JAAAX's -15.72%.

JAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICVT and JAAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer