BN.PA vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Performance
BN.PA vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BN.PA vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.PA Danone S.A. | -10.05% | 21.29% | 15.04% | 23.27% | -6.58% | 4.99% | -24.68% | 23.45% | -9.49% | 19.29% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -17.60% | -32.79% | 8.14% | -22.36% | 36.03% | 27.39% | 4.23% | 46.36% | -28.36% | -12.86% |
Different Trading Currencies
BN.PA is traded in EUR, while GIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GIS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN.PA achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -17.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BN.PA has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 4.39%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -2.12% annualized return.
BN.PA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 6M
- -5.96%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -16.66%
- YTD
- -17.60%
- 6M
- -23.57%
- 1Y
- -38.95%
- 3Y*
- -22.85%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- -2.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN.PA vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
BN.PA
GIS
BN.PA vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BN.PA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | -1.62 | +1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | -2.47 | +2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.73 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.95 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | -1.71 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BN.PA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | -1.62 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | -0.27 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | -0.09 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BN.PA and GIS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BN.PA vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BN.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than GIS's 6.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.PA Danone S.A. | 3.11% | 2.80% | 3.22% | 3.41% | 3.94% | 3.55% | 3.91% | 2.63% | 3.09% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 2.41% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.53% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
BN.PA vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN.PA drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -58.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.PA and GIS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN.PA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -55.55% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.29% | -37.97% | +20.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -55.55% | +28.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.87% | -55.55% | +14.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.24% | -54.09% | +40.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.14% | -10.07% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.08% | 18.79% | -11.71% |
Volatility
BN.PA vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 6.82% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BN.PA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 7.09% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.22% | 18.43% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 24.05% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 21.68% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 22.75% | -3.60% |
Financials
BN.PA vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danone S.A. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities