BN.PA vs. ^FCHI

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and CAC 40 (^FCHI).

Performance

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BN.PA Danone S.A.	-9.82%	21.29%	15.04%	23.27%	-6.58%	4.99%	-24.68%	23.45%	-9.49%	19.29%
^FCHI CAC 40	-2.30%	10.42%	-2.15%	16.52%	-9.50%	28.85%	-7.14%	26.37%	-10.95%	9.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BN.PA achieves a -9.82% return, which is significantly lower than ^FCHI's -2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BN.PA has underperformed ^FCHI with an annualized return of 4.34%, while ^FCHI has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.

BN.PA

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: -9.82%
• 6M: -6.23%
• 1Y: 1.15%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: 4.34%

^FCHI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: -2.30%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: 2.72%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BN.PA

BN.PA Risk / Return Rank: 39
BN.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BN.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BN.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BN.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BN.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

^FCHI

^FCHI Risk / Return Rank: 30
^FCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
^FCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
^FCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 17
^FCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
^FCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danone S.A. (BN.PA) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BN.PA	^FCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.08	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	0.21	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.03	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.35	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	4.63	-4.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BN.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the ^FCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BN.PA and ^FCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BN.PA	^FCHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	0.08	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.33	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.35	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.21	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between BN.PA and ^FCHI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BN.PA drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum ^FCHI drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.PA and ^FCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BN.PA	^FCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.10%	-65.29%	+19.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.29%	-11.08%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.95%	-23.04%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.87%	-38.56%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.02%	-7.64%	-5.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.14%	-23.58%	+9.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.13%	3.23%	+3.90%

Volatility

BN.PA vs. ^FCHI - Volatility Comparison

Danone S.A. (BN.PA) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to CAC 40 (^FCHI) at 5.18%. This indicates that BN.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^FCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BN.PA	^FCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	5.18%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.20%	9.46%	+7.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.91%	15.86%	+6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	16.17%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.14%	17.66%	+1.48%