BMNU vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BMNU is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BMNU vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -73.22% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.67% return.

BMNU

• 1D: 10.82%
• 1M: -43.61%
• YTD: -73.22%
• 6M: -86.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNU vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	-73.22%	-81.57%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.67%	0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNU and RBIL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

BMNU vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNU vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNU	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.53	4.24	-4.77

Drawdowns

BMNU vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNU	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.05%	-0.50%	-96.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.73%	-0.03%	-96.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.79%	-0.06%	-79.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNU	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	187.61%	0.92%	+186.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.61%	1.05%	+186.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	187.61%	1.05%	+186.56%

BMNU vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNU vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.

Position	TTM	2025
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNU and RBIL in my portfolio?

BMNU and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNU or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNU or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNU or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.

What is the main difference between BMNU and RBIL?

BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.17% for RBIL.