BMNU vs. QTJL
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
BMNU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -79.08% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 6.86% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -21.88%
- 1M
- -55.16%
- YTD
- -79.08%
- 6M
- -87.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -79.08% | -81.57% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.86% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and QTJL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
QTJL
BMNU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMNU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.52 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.45%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.45% | -33.40% | -64.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.45% | -0.30% | -97.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | -7.93% | -71.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.75% | 10.00% | +178.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.75% | 20.41% | +168.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.75% | 20.41% | +168.34% |
BMNU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer