BMI vs. AIG
BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) and AIG (American International Group, Inc.) are both stocks. BMI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while AIG operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, BMI returned 14.99%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for AIG. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMI vs. AIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than AIG's -10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed AIG with an annualized return of 14.99%, while AIG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.00% annualized return.
BMI
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 13.87%
- YTD
- -24.02%
- 6M
- -28.30%
- 1Y
- -45.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
AIG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -10.94%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- -9.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
BMI vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -24.02% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
AIG American International Group, Inc. | -10.94% | 20.03% | 9.75% | 9.79% | 13.76% | 53.92% | -23.08% | 33.58% | -32.09% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMI and AIG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.22 |
The correlation between BMI and AIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BMI:
$3.87B
AIG:
$41.07B
BMI:
$4.42
AIG:
$4.25
BMI:
29.78
AIG:
17.81
BMI:
4.34
AIG:
2.14
BMI:
$896.73M
AIG:
$20.00B
BMI:
$370.96M
AIG:
$7.09B
BMI:
$199.34M
AIG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMI vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank
BMI
AIG
BMI vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMI | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.94 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.58 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -1.02 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMI vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and AIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMI | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.22% | -99.64% | +31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.79% | -16.98% | -36.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.06% | -16.98% | -38.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.06% | -26.45% | -28.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -69.58% | +14.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.63% | -93.84% | +46.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -51.23% | +32.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.04% | 9.53% | +23.51% |
Volatility
BMI vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison
Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to American International Group, Inc. (AIG) at 6.64%. This indicates that BMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMI | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 6.64% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.68% | 17.67% | +21.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 23.69% | +20.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 26.60% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.67% | 32.60% | +1.07% |
Dividends
BMI vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison
BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than AIG's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIG American International Group, Inc. | 2.38% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 3.38% | 2.49% | 3.25% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 1.31% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.21% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
Financials
BMI vs. AIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BMI and AIG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMI has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to AIG (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMI dropped -68.22% vs AIG's -99.64%.
AIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMI and AIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer