BMI vs. ASR
BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) and ASR (Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BMI in Electrical Equipment & Parts, ASR in Airports & Air Services. Over the past 10 years, BMI returned 15.68%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for ASR. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BMI vs. ASR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -22.51% return, which is significantly lower than ASR's -13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed ASR with an annualized return of 15.68%, while ASR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.
BMI
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- 6M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- -22.51%
- 1Y
- -25.12%
- 3Y*
- -5.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.22%
ASR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -11.32%
- 6M
- -18.63%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- -2.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.18M | $19.22M | $21.39M | |
| $96.39M | $73.48M | $68.10M |
BMI vs. ASR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -22.51% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
ASR Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. | -13.16% | 42.19% | -9.20% | 32.09% | 16.98% | 27.81% | -11.99% | 28.79% | -15.64% | 26.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMI and ASR is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2000 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
BMI:
$3.89B
ASR:
$8.27B
BMI:
$4.27
ASR:
MX$333.24
BMI:
31.43
ASR:
14.34
BMI:
1.31
ASR:
0.72
BMI:
4.48
ASR:
3.74
BMI:
4.84
ASR:
3.46
BMI:
$880.96M
ASR:
MX$38.38B
BMI:
$363.92M
ASR:
MX$19.28B
BMI:
$188.13M
ASR:
MX$19.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMI vs. ASR — Risk / Return Rank
BMI
ASR
BMI vs. ASR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMI | ASR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.09 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.20 | -1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMI vs. ASR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, which is greater than ASR's maximum drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and ASR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMI | ASR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.22% | -61.33% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.85% | -28.42% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.06% | -31.11% | -23.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.06% | -35.28% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -61.33% | +6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.59% | -26.32% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -14.49% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.69% | 13.16% | +7.53% |
Volatility
BMI vs. ASR - Volatility Comparison
Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a higher volatility of 17.92% compared to Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) at 8.43%. This indicates that BMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMI | ASR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.92% | 8.43% | +9.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.24% | 22.84% | +17.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.09% | 27.19% | +17.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.82% | 32.58% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 34.81% | -0.66% |
Dividends
BMI vs. ASR - Dividend Comparison
BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than ASR's 7.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASR Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. | 7.96% | 12.61% | 4.68% | 3.86% | 3.18% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | 2.29% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.52% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
Financials
BMI vs. ASR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BMI vs. ASR - Profitability Comparison
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.77M and revenue of 222.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
ASR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported a gross profit of 4.03B and revenue of 9.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.38M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
ASR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported an operating income of 3.91B and revenue of 9.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 29.72M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.
ASR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported a net income of 2.31B and revenue of 9.63B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMI and ASR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMI has higher volatility (17.92%) compared to ASR (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMI dropped -68.22% vs ASR's -61.33%.
ASR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMI and ASR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer