BMI vs. CHD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD).

Performance

BMI vs. CHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BMI vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMI Badger Meter, Inc.	-11.35%	-17.15%	38.28%	42.58%	3.23%	14.11%	46.37%	33.46%	4.09%	30.91%
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc.	11.08%	-18.91%	11.96%	18.72%	-20.41%	18.89%	25.46%	8.36%	33.23%	15.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BMI : $4.56B CHD : $22.25B
EPS BMI : $4.79 CHD : $3.02
PE Ratio BMI : 32.19 CHD : 30.78
PEG Ratio BMI : 1.35 CHD : 3.36
PS Ratio BMI : 4.97 CHD : 3.66
Total Revenue (TTM) BMI : $916.66M CHD : $6.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) BMI : $382.07M CHD : $2.77B
EBITDA (TTM) BMI : $223.24M CHD : $1.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -11.35% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 11.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed CHD with an annualized return of 17.64%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.48% annualized return.

BMI

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: -11.35%
• 6M: -12.28%
• 1Y: -19.28%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 17.64%

CHD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -10.68%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: -14.08%
• 3Y*: 2.85%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 8.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BMI vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMI

BMI Risk / Return Rank: 23
BMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BMI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BMI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CHD

CHD Risk / Return Rank: 18
CHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CHD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CHD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMI vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMI	CHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	-0.63	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.46	-0.77	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.91	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.57	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	-0.90	+0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMI vs. CHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMI Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is comparable to the CHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMI and CHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMI	CHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	-0.63	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.13	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.39	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.51	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BMI and CHD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BMI vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison

BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than CHD's 1.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMI Badger Meter, Inc.	1.00%	0.85%	0.58%	0.64%	0.78%	0.71%	0.74%	0.99%	1.14%	1.03%	1.16%	1.33%
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc.	1.28%	1.41%	1.08%	1.15%	1.30%	0.99%	1.10%	1.29%	1.32%	1.51%	1.61%	1.58%

Drawdowns

BMI vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and CHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMI	CHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.22%	-51.52%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.92%	-25.68%	-17.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.92%	-31.72%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.92%	-31.72%	-11.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.89%	-16.91%	-21.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.88%	-11.99%	-6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.96%	16.20%	+10.76%

Volatility

BMI vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 4.81%. This indicates that BMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMI	CHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	4.81%	+4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.38%	15.77%	+10.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.65%	22.55%	+16.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.77%	20.35%	+11.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.72%	21.67%	+11.05%

Financials

BMI vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Badger Meter, Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.99M and revenue of 220.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

CHD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 753.80M and revenue of 1.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

BMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.05M and revenue of 220.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

CHD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 266.00M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

BMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 33.58M and revenue of 220.71M, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

CHD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 143.50M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.