AIG vs. MET
Compare and contrast key facts about American International Group, Inc. (AIG) and MetLife, Inc. (MET).
Performance
AIG vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIG vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIG American International Group, Inc. | -11.16% | 20.03% | 9.75% | 9.79% | 13.76% | 53.92% | -23.08% | 33.58% | -32.09% | -6.86% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | -9.20% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
Fundamentals
AIG:
$4.14
MET:
$7.54
AIG:
18.27
MET:
9.44
AIG:
0.77
MET:
0.22
AIG:
2.13
MET:
0.42
AIG:
$20.22B
MET:
$76.13B
AIG:
$7.02B
MET:
$12.20B
AIG:
$6.09B
MET:
$4.34B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIG achieves a -11.16% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AIG has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 5.86%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.
AIG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- -11.16%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -11.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
MET
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- -9.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIG vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
AIG
MET
AIG vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American International Group, Inc. (AIG) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | -0.34 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | -0.28 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.50 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -1.23 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | -0.34 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.36 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.24 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIG and MET is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AIG vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
AIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than MET's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIG American International Group, Inc. | 2.38% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 3.38% | 2.49% | 3.25% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 1.31% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 3.19% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Drawdowns
AIG vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIG drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIG and MET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.64% | -82.37% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -17.46% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | -35.09% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.58% | -55.16% | -14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.85% | -16.42% | -77.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | -17.71% | -33.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 7.08% | +1.99% |
Volatility
AIG vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
American International Group, Inc. (AIG) and MetLife, Inc. (MET) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 6.50% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.98% | 17.82% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 28.52% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 25.67% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 30.73% | +1.79% |
Financials
AIG vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American International Group, Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities