PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIG vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIG vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American International Group, Inc. (AIG) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIG achieves a -9.42% return, which is significantly lower than AB's -2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AIG has underperformed AB with an annualized return of 6.85%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


AIG

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-9.42%
6M
-10.51%
1Y
-8.70%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
6.85%

AB

1D
-0.50%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-3.65%
1Y
-2.34%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIG vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
-9.42%20.03%9.75%9.79%13.76%53.92%-23.08%33.58%-32.09%-6.86%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-2.75%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AIG and AB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1988

0.37

The correlation between AIG and AB shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIG:

$41.49B

AB:

$3.31B

EPS

AIG:

$4.25

AB:

$3.22

PE Ratio

AIG:

18.00

AB:

11.11

PS Ratio

AIG:

2.16

AB:

13.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIG:

$20.00B

AB:

$250.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIG:

$7.09B

AB:

$250.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

AIG:

$5.81B

AB:

$252.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIG vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIG
AIG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIG vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American International Group, Inc. (AIG) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.00

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.16

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

-0.33

-0.56

AIG vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIG and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIG vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIG drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than AB's maximum drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIG and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-87.65%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

-14.68%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-20.59%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-45.76%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.58%

-58.08%

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.73%

-12.57%

-81.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-26.19%

-25.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.71%

7.03%

+2.68%

Volatility

AIG vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 3.69%. This indicates that AIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

3.69%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

17.88%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.78%

22.28%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.46%

28.19%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.55%

32.38%

+0.17%

Dividends

AIG vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

AIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than AB's 9.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.53%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
2.42%2.05%2.14%2.07%2.02%2.25%3.38%2.49%3.25%2.15%1.96%1.31%

Financials

AIG vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American International Group, Inc. and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B2022202320242025202600
(AIG) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIG and AB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIG has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to AB (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIG dropped -99.64% vs AB's -87.65%.

AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIG and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer