BMI vs. BDC
Compare and contrast key facts about Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Belden Inc. (BDC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BMI or BDC.
Key characteristics
BMI | BDC | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 22.65% | 14.28% |
1Y Return | 38.52% | 12.64% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 27.82% | 27.41% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 28.96% | 7.89% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 24.08% | 2.53% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.34 | 0.27 |
Daily Std Dev | 30.12% | 41.61% |
Max Drawdown | -68.22% | -85.69% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -10.74% |
Fundamentals
BMI | BDC | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.56B | $3.59B |
EPS | $3.48 | $5.11 |
PE Ratio | 54.31 | 17.27 |
PEG Ratio | 2.29 | 2.14 |
Revenue (TTM) | $740.77M | $2.41B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $219.97M | $926.35M |
EBITDA (TTM) | $158.64M | $389.17M |
Correlation
The correlation between BMI and BDC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BMI vs. BDC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than BDC's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed BDC with an annualized return of 24.08%, while BDC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BMI vs. BDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Belden Inc. (BDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BMI vs. BDC - Dividend Comparison
BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than BDC's 0.23% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Badger Meter, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.25% | 1.28% |
Belden Inc. | 0.23% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.50% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
BMI vs. BDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, smaller than the maximum BDC drawdown of -85.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and BDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BMI vs. BDC - Volatility Comparison
Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to Belden Inc. (BDC) at 11.46%. This indicates that BMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BMI vs. BDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and Belden Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities