PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMA vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMA vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMA achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BMA has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 7.23%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


BMA

1D
-2.47%
1M
2.44%
6M
-6.61%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
66.06%
5Y*
57.72%
10Y*
7.23%
ALL TIME*
11.15%

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.59M$20.98M$24.29M
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

BMA vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
5.94%-3.55%277.79%91.62%27.04%-9.96%-57.05%-14.00%-60.72%81.54%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BMA and USO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006

0.16

The correlation between BMA and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMA vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMA
BMA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMA vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMAUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.93

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

5.60

-3.69

BMA vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMA and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMA vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMA drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMA and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.66%

-98.19%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.38%

-32.49%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.40%

-32.49%

-32.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.40%

-36.23%

-29.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.66%

-86.75%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.66%

-86.26%

+71.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-75.38%

+30.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.35%

12.03%

+9.32%

Volatility

BMA vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) is 16.58%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that BMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMAUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.58%

17.73%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.83%

42.79%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.00%

46.91%

+28.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.88%

37.06%

+22.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.53%

39.29%

+23.24%

Dividends

BMA vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
5.35%2.38%6.10%7.75%7.28%0.00%0.00%6.20%5.05%0.65%1.53%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMA and USO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to BMA (16.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMA dropped -91.66% vs USO's -98.19%.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMA and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer